Methodology · REDD+

73% of REDD+ projects waiting at Verra list methodologies that cannot earn the CCP label

146 projects in the queue are on VM0007 and its siblings; 51 are on VM0048. Their numbers are going to change.

146REDD+ projects on older methodologies
51on VM0048
169 Mta year claimed by the older group
Carbon.Supply Analyst · registries as read 2026-10-01

In late 2024 the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market approved Verra’s consolidated REDD+ methodology, VM0048, for its Core Carbon Principles label, alongside Verra’s jurisdictional framework and ART’s TREES. In the same decision it said credits from the older project-level REDD+ methodologies (VM0006, VM0007, VM0009, VM0015 and VM0037) could not carry the label (ICVCM). Verra has made VM0048 its REDD+ methodology for new projects.

The queue has not caught up. On 1 October 2026, 201 REDD+ projects were in Verra’s pipeline or under validation. 146 of them list one of the older methodologies on their registry page; 51 list VM0048. The older-methodology projects claim 169 million tonnes a year between them, against 40 million for the VM0048 group.

Registered REDD+ tells the same story from the other end. Of Verra’s registered REDD+ projects, 96 use an older methodology and 1 uses VM0048. The CCP-eligible REDD+ supply that buyers with integrity screens are asking for barely exists on the project-level side of the registry yet.

Older methodology listedProjects listing it (some list several)
VM000775
VM001547
VM000915
VM000610
VM00377

Where they are

The older-methodology projects in the queue are in Brazil (53), DR Congo (14), Colombia (11), Indonesia (11), Zambia (8), India (6). The VM0048 projects are in Brazil (19), Peru (7), Zambia (3), Indonesia (3), Tanzania (2), Philippines (2).

Why it matters. For a buyer, an older-methodology REDD+ listing is a project that will need to transition, or will sell outside the CCP-screened part of the market. For a developer or investor, the transition is where the work is: a VM0048 project takes its baseline from a jurisdictional allocation rather than its own reference region, which often means fewer credits per hectare and a different deal. A listed project still on VM0007 is a project whose numbers are going to change.

ICVCM’s decision concerns methodologies. Whether particular credits carry the CCP label is shown on the registry (Verra tags labelled credits). Methodologies are as listed on Verra today; we have not read each project’s documents.

Paid editions

All 201 REDD+ projects in Verra’s queue with methodology, country, proponent and claimed tonnes. Paid editions get the full list, updated daily.

Get the full list →
Sources
Free weekly read

Registries read daily. Stories like this one, weekly.

Every status change on Verra, Gold Standard, Isometric and Equitable Earth, by region and by type, with the full project lists behind stories like this one.

Get the free weekly read →
More data stories
841 Mta year claimed by the pipeline
Pipeline · Global

2,814 carbon projects are waiting to be validated. Together they claim 841 million tonnes a year.

72%of the Philippine pipeline from two projects
Registry watch · Philippines

Two projects from one developer are 72% of the Philippines’ carbon pipeline

920registered projects late or on hold
Data · Global

920 registered carbon projects are late to verify, on hold or denied. India and China are 57% of them.

1.1 bncredits issued and never retired
Supply · Global

1.1 billion carbon credits have been issued and never retired. Here is what they are.

102registry changes, 20 September – 1 October
Registry log · Global

Eleven days on the registries: 102 changes, two withdrawals from China’s largest hog farmer, and India still listing solar